Today was one of my two English-class-heavy days per week (two survey classes don’t seem like a lot on paper, but when you factor in reading and journals…). The first class every day is a very good class, but it’s usually fairly uneventful; it’s not boring, but it’s not exciting either.
My second class, on the other hand, is a complete lottery as to what you’re getting each time. Sometimes it’s ridiculously boring, like one would expect a survey class about early modern literature would be. Those are the days I struggle to stay awake in class, as procrastinating perfectionists/sleep and caffeine deprived students are wont to do. Other days, something seems to possess Dr. Professor (obviously not his real name) and class has a tendency to get very weird and very interesting, or at least attention-getting. Today was one of the latter.
Today we were discussing the literary history of sex, eroticism, and concupiscence. Now, for those of you who aren’t in this class, that’s going to be confusing, so I’ll go over it quickly. We’re talking three main categories of literature through three main ideological time periods: Sex = (moderner) Early Modern; Erotic = Humanism; Concupiscence = Medieval (Christian). The three words are describing the act of sexual intercourse: Sex is the objective observation of the physical act, it’s merely an event; Erotic is about goodness and ethics, both partners must be aiming to give the other pleasure and love; Concupiscence is the sinful act of unmarried/non-reproductive intercourse, pleasure on Earth is sinful and evil. Got it? So, anyway, in a more in depth discussion of concupiscence and others (since Dr. Professor is awful about just telling us things- did I mention this is all about a group project due two weeks after he assigned it?), Dr. Professor decided to pull out (heh) one of his sex analogies. His favorite, and the one he used today, was the “Am I in the hall?” example. He was explaining how definitions were arbitrary when it came to intercourse, such as what truly was intercourse? Answer: the penis going into the vagina. Okay, simple enough, right? No, cuz when are you actually in? …yeah, this is English, not health class here. So he illustrated by opening the door and being in various positions in/out of the classroom. Of course, the angels we are, my classmates and I are laughing hysterically. I could only think “hotdog down a hallway” for the rest of that analogy. Then there was talking about how sex is the objective observation of the act and could you do that if you were involved in said act? Another of his favorite things to do when referring to how modern people react is to tell you to picture an employee of the DMV doing that. So of course, I got a ridiculous picture in my head of the most bored and unexcited DMV employee dealing with a passionate partner…and because I laughed, I got called to attention for noticing the incongruity, and I hate being in the spotlight. >.< The funniest bit, to me, was when we were discussing, in depth, the concupiscence in Chapter 4 of The Book of Margery Kempe. We were, of course, discussing the time this one hot dude came up to her in church and said, “‘Sup? We should bang,” and then left. And how she totally fell for it and then finally showed up at his door saying, “Yeah, let’s bang,” and now he’s all, “Uh-uh, sister, I’d rather be chopped up and eaten than have anything to do with your skanky whore self. Peace.” Now, our group was discussing this when Dr. Professor came by and he specifically asked me what I thought, since I had been talking about it at that point. Of course, I say that the dickhead was being a real jerk. I mean, it’s bad enough to reject someone. It’s worse when you started it. It’s even worse when you more or less call her a whore and say you’d rather be ravaged by cannibals than be with her. But that’s not how the Christians would see it, so that’s what he wanted me to explore. To do this, he started acting it out….with my friend and group member, MC. Poor, poor MC. I’m not sure anything has ever been quite as creepy as having a middle-aged professor you think is quite possibly gay sidling up to you to proposition you, very much in your space. Anyway, I, of course, found it rather funny, though I also felt bad for my now-scarred friend.
And that’s just one installment of “Sexual Analogies and Interpretations” presented by the Dr. Professor Theatre Company.